View Full Version : GT-S in the 13's TOTALLY N/A!! NO NO2!!!!
Da Kine Guy
04-05-2002, 11:36 PM
http://forums.baycelicas.org/viewtopic.php?t=4032
Edit: Well, seems to be the slip is a fake. Please don't look down on the SF Bay Celica community because of one guys immaturity, I guess I was just caught up in the moment and wanted to share the info with you guys over here. It's really sad what some people do for attention nowadays. Oh well, if anything at least I exposed this guy to the masses where we were able to expose this guy for what he really was.
first Maelfyn with his 14 sec gt and now this guy with his 13 sec gt-s....
FriedRice
04-06-2002, 12:18 AM
mommy. :eek:
jotan82
04-06-2002, 12:46 AM
congrats
Spec GTS
04-06-2002, 01:13 AM
a 1.6 60ft on 18's?!?! trapped at 110!?!?...doesn't seem believable to me...but if it is...WOW
X-EVIL-X
04-06-2002, 01:25 AM
BS...
im sorry but trapping at 110 and a 60 foot of 1.6.
its not a celica...
even with nos a celica cant get a 1.6 60 foot.
common guys you actually believe this?
nyoneway
04-06-2002, 01:26 AM
Yea rite.. no way a FWD car can get 1.6sec 60 foot time without drags. No ****ing way. That's 4wd territory.
X-EVIL-X
04-06-2002, 04:21 AM
even with drags your lucky to get into the 2.1 range.
Kit99bar
04-06-2002, 05:50 AM
it's fake man
if a celi gets 13s it's gonna be more like 13.9xx@99mph
that time slip looks like a rearwheel drive car on slicks
Keyshawn
04-06-2002, 07:47 AM
I'm gonna haveta be skeptical about this one. 1.6 sec 60 foot times? 110 mph trap speeds? I'd haveta see it with my own eyes to buy that from mildly modded n/a Celi.
RiceBoy Killer
04-06-2002, 08:58 AM
This Tool Box didn't even say what kind of LSD he had. Or don't even tell me he ran with an open differential and got 1.6 60'...on 18's....puahahaha...LMAO
And the slip prints the type of car, wow...unheard of.
People, for now, BillyBrun still has the record of 14.1xx.
t2000gts
04-06-2002, 10:04 AM
i hate to call bs on another celica owner but....
well it does say celica on the slip, some tracks enter car names instead of numbers, mine did that once or twice.
if he ran 13.78 @ 99-100mph i might've believed it, but 1.6 60' and 110mph trap? people spray 50 shots of nitrous and only trap around 105-106!
he needs to be running over 240-250hp at the crank, even if he is 200lbs. lighter to trap that high.
oldster
04-06-2002, 10:58 AM
Just for grins I plugged into a site I found, really can't vouch for the accuracy but using 2600 lbs. for the weight at 13.78 it is putting down 196HP at the wheels.
http://www.geocities.com/realstreetpower/
X-EVIL-X
04-06-2002, 12:48 PM
easy it was the older celica with all wheel drive
t2000gts
04-06-2002, 01:00 PM
the alltrac wasn't a GT-S it was a GT-4. and if a GT4 could trap 110mph, it would be into 12s with a 1.6 60'.
with such an insanely good launch and only running 13.78...i gotta call bs on something.
00 LSM GTS
04-06-2002, 01:48 PM
real fishy if not BS...
the timeslip looks like it could be photoshopped too, the print on the slip seems to just lay on there perfectly on the shadows were it's suppose to have bends and creases.
BoyRacer
04-06-2002, 04:52 PM
i think its bs......just what the guy is saying makes me think he doesnt know what hes doing......200lbs lighter no trunk. what does that mean.....? with the hatch off and nothing no muffler, you wouldnt loose 200lbs.
Maelfyn
04-06-2002, 07:03 PM
It's not real. A 60 foot like that is not possible with a GT-S on 18s.. lol. This is an AWD or RWD with slicks. Also 200 lbs of weight reduction isn't possible either. Trust me. I know. The only way it is possible is if you are taking everything out of the interior. Speakers, dash, gauges, AC, everything.
Coolwheels00
04-06-2002, 07:51 PM
Uhmmm... 94mph by the 1/8th mile....Hell no....NO WAY...Not in a NA GTS. Aint happening. Sorry
How the heck can people believe such nonesense!
I could make a slip, or better yet find 1 of millions on the net with an ET of 13.5 and call it myn. Its amazing how people believe someone who simply posts a "whacked out" slip. If he had found a slip with a 2.1 60', or even a 2.0 (stretching it) 60'....then and only THEN would I atleast think he was telling the truth.
Trapping at 110mph, doesnt that imply atleast 200+hp to the WHEELS??
Another thing...how often do tracks write down the name of the car on the slip...yet at the same time fail to write down the name of the other car??
Every which way you look at it...its B.S. Unless he has a RWD conversion...slicks...and a 75shot of NOS for that trap speed. :nono:
i got a 2.06 60 ft on stock tires...enuff ppl dont believe me so how can u believe a 1.6 60 ft on 18s????
If it was even on 15's or 14" rims..then its more believable...
Just to clarify the original slip...here is what it "should" have looked like to some extent if it was more real. :gap:
http://members.shaw.ca/sixspdceli/new/yup.JPG
larryd
04-06-2002, 10:09 PM
no ****ing way..im sorry but even if I saw it on video I wouldtn beleive it.. a 1.6 60ft time is literally impossible for a FWD car that isnt on slicks and running ALOT of power off the line like s/c, turbo thats spooled or a large shot of nitrous.. no way boys.. sorry.. this guy is full of **** and the sad part about it is over on that Bay Celicas forum he is starting to talk trash..
"I will show any off you the timeslip in person if you want! Or if any of you would like to put your money where your mouth i would glady take it from you!"
he also went on to say he can a 14.48 bone stock.. now everyone here knows that thats BS.. especially when he goes on to say
"take it easy boys, you gotta remember im not a professional driver lol"
jotan82
04-06-2002, 10:25 PM
someone raise the flag
oldster
04-06-2002, 10:34 PM
Originally posted by IRL
If it was even on 15's or 14" rims..then its more believable...
Just to clarify the original slip...here is what it "should" have looked like to some extent if it was more real. :gap:
http://members.shaw.ca/sixspdceli/new/yup.JPG
Better, except for that 7.5 in the 1/8....:)
2kgtx
04-06-2002, 10:41 PM
:bs: :bs: :bs:
There is no way, it is just not possible, sounds like someone wants to be flammed.
larryd
04-06-2002, 11:15 PM
AHA.. finally my eye paid off.. I went back and looked at the time slip he posted on bay area celicas forum..if you look at the column with all the #s in it you can tell the background color isnt the same as the rest of the slip..its pretty damned close but it doesnt appear to be the same
MeGaXmAn27
04-07-2002, 01:01 AM
wow good eye larry...damn these 4 eyes of mine
http://www.joshiexo.com/hmmmm.JPG
I just opened this picture in paint, and filled the outside with yellow. You'll notice it makes almost a perfect box around the numbers.
I'm not a paint shop pro...so maybe someone here who is, can check that part of the picture out and make sure it's legit.
larryd
04-07-2002, 01:54 AM
basically its 2 time slips both scanned in and the row was copied onto the the one side under where it says Celica.. hence a fake timeslip..
Coolwheels00
04-07-2002, 06:34 AM
Haha, Nice Try, Move Along, Maybe Next Time.
m0rgue
04-07-2002, 07:31 AM
Haaaaa. I love it. Does that guy feel much better about himself 'cause of a fake timeslip?
racinjason
04-07-2002, 12:51 PM
What a joke. 14.48 stock. ROTFLMAO!!! With trap speeds like that I would expect to run well into the low 13's. What a joke.
momocorsa
04-07-2002, 12:58 PM
Hey this is the guy with the 13.78 gts. If you dout me put your money where you slow ass mouth is and race me like a man. If not shut the **** and learn to drive you might have good times to!
Keyshawn
04-07-2002, 01:17 PM
momocorsa, relax. People just find a 1.6 sec 60 ft time and a 110 mph trap speed hard to believe on a mildly modded GT-S. Now as far as racing you, I don't think people care enough to drive over to No Cal or Oregon to do that (except maybe for peeps that live there). You just gotta expect people not to believe such extraordinary times like that. If the skepticism doesn't concern you, then cool. Just let people say what they want, and get used to getting flamed. If it really DOES bother you, maybe you should do something like videotape your runs, and have a bunch of local peeps from the Celica boards witness your runs. Just offering a little advice.:)
scapamouche
04-07-2002, 01:24 PM
Some of us in NorCal don't care enough either.
NSX_GTR_LM
04-07-2002, 01:34 PM
Originally posted by momocorsa
Hey this is the guy with the 13.78 gts. If you dout me put your money where you slow ass mouth is and race me like a man. If not shut the **** and learn to drive you might have good times to!
Yeah whatever dude. You might as well admit to it and become part of the club. Just blame it on your buddy or somethin, and no harm done. But no, you have to go sayin sheeit like a moron instead of tellin the truth. Hence, you are a dumbass. What is up with all these BSn people keyshawn?
Bobbeh
04-07-2002, 02:49 PM
Those numbers look cut 'n' paste. Therefore
:bs: :nono:
2000 XYR
04-07-2002, 05:53 PM
I couldn't even get a 1.6 60' without DR's and a couple mods (and even then it'd be tough). Sub 2.0 isn't too hard but to get a 1.6 you're running major mods, major HP, and more so major traction. Not gonna happen in a FWD car, escpecially with 18's and Paradas. Nope.
racinjason
04-07-2002, 06:02 PM
Well the childish remarks he left here and on the other Celica board goes to show it a complete joke.
NSX_GTR_LM
04-07-2002, 07:06 PM
I know how he did it.
He has a beast celica, so he busted it out in the 1/8th mile, then slammed on the brakes really quick, then accellerated to 110 :)
Man, if you are gonna lie, at least do it right and have all the angles covered:fawk:
PapiChuu
04-07-2002, 09:24 PM
TOTAL BS, first of all a 60' like that, u better have an awd car, the pro front wheel drive cars get like 1.4s 1.5s, my friends 600hp sentra gets 1.5's and u gonna try and tell us u got a 1.6 60', second, if your trapping 110 MPH i would really hope u get from the 1000' to the 1320 in less then 4 seconds im trapping 97/98 MPH and gettin from the 1000 to the 1320 at about 2.3 seconds, third i just renewed my will and hope for the celi, so i will be the first in the 13's NA :)
NSX_GTR_LM
04-07-2002, 09:27 PM
good for you papichuu. The other thing is, notice how if he just kept his car at his 1/8 mile time with no accelleration, he would have hit like a 12 somethin. what a dork.
nmyeti
04-08-2002, 12:22 AM
Funny stuff...
1.6 60 foot time + a 110 trap = about a 12.0-12.1 ET
The math can't seem to play out too many other ways.
For the record, i ran a 1.72 60 foot time. Add that to my 110 trap and you have a 12.3 run.
My 1/8th ET was 7.909 and trap was 88mph IIRC.
-Nathan
kabal57
04-08-2002, 12:36 AM
Originally posted by scapamouche
Some of us in NorCal don't care enough either.
I'll second that :bs:
momocorsa definantly does not reflect on the rest of us N. cali peoples. We met the guy once.. were nice to him, complimented on his car... and he turns around and lies to us and then when questioned pulls the name calling. Not cool.. not cool at all. Did he think telling us he hit the 13's was gonna make him cool?
Maelfyn
04-08-2002, 03:07 AM
Oh sh`t! I think this means you lose! Would you like to play again? Yes/No?
At least make your bull sh`t believable next time! Thx!
billybrun
04-13-2002, 05:43 PM
This thread really got my attention. I don't like to talk negative stuff about people but... to get 110 mph you need at least 75hp or plenty of weight taken out.
Does anybody knows this guy? Has anybody seen this? Just asking... Good job, if you're not bsing.
00CericaRuss
04-14-2002, 01:56 AM
Originally posted by scapamouche
Some of us in NorCal don't care enough either.
:werd:
jotan82
04-15-2002, 07:03 AM
bottles 9 sec supra got a 1.6 60'
this thread is pretty funny
ICUinMyRearview
04-15-2002, 11:33 AM
If I could drift like that kid on the tricycle. I would be so cool
larryd
04-15-2002, 10:57 PM
RWD and like 1000hp :)
gsport
04-18-2002, 12:25 AM
Sups yeh even that maeflyn guy with his 14 sec 97 mph gt. i posted to find out some info on his car dyno #'s what kind clutch ect. no response. most of us wasnt born yesterday.
TeeAreDeaGeeTeeEss
04-18-2002, 08:15 AM
Originally posted by gsport
Sups yeh even that maeflyn guy with his 14 sec 97 mph gt. i posted to find out some info on his car dyno #'s what kind clutch ect. no response. most of us wasnt born yesterday.
and some of us were. :rolleyes:
so your saying maeflyn's time is BS? :chuckles: be prepared to get flamed.
ringthree
04-18-2002, 08:22 AM
Yep, heres the first "flame". I have seen the slips. Tons o' them. IM him if you want.
racinjason
04-18-2002, 08:52 AM
Why does he need to show you dyno numbers to prove his claims???? He has the interior stripped out and all kinds of weight savings. Will that show up on a Dyno??? He also doesn't need an aftermarket clutch to run those times.
Keyshawn
04-18-2002, 10:46 AM
Originally posted by gsport
Sups yeh even that maeflyn guy with his 14 sec 97 mph gt. i posted to find out some info on his car dyno #'s what kind clutch ect. no response. most of us wasnt born yesterday.
It's OK to be skeptical about that. I, myself give him the benefit of the doubt because he seems to be an honest, stand up guy on the board. Anyway, it's not really important enough for me to NEED to see videos of his runs or be there in person for his runs. I just leave it at that. You could always ask him if he has videos of his runs or something.
kaioshin
04-18-2002, 11:48 AM
Originally posted by gsport
Sups yeh even that maeflyn guy with his 14 sec 97 mph gt. i posted to find out some info on his car dyno #'s what kind clutch ect. no response. most of us wasnt born yesterday.
#2 flame...
Yeah, he actually does run those times. I've been there on several occasions. So has Larryd and Icyjaws. He can definitely runs those times. And definitely don't need anything special to run those times. All he has are simple bolts-ons. He just strips his car down to nothing and can shift fast as sh!t.
And just because you posted somewhere on this board asking him about what mods he has just so you can copy him and think you have a fast GT too, doesn't mean he saw it.
And it's not like he hasn't posted his timeslips up either. If still aren't sure, you can always drive down here and he can physically show you. Or do you need to sit in his lap while he's driving for it to be enough proof for you???
ringthree
04-18-2002, 11:57 AM
I take it back, Joe didn't run those times. He doesn't even exist. He's a figment of my imagination. A construct that I have created because I have always wanted to be slower than a GT
God I think I am so funny!
kaioshin
04-18-2002, 12:01 PM
Originally posted by ringthree
I take it back, Joe didn't run those times. He doesn't even exist. He's a figment of my imagination. A construct that I have created because I have always wanted to be slower than a GT
God I think I am so funny!
Ringthree == :gay:
:rofl:
ringthree
04-18-2002, 12:05 PM
kaioshin = TEH GHEY DORK LORD MASTER
Bow down to TEH GHEY DORK LORD MASTER
:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: :gay::evil:
GOD this is spiralling to Off Topic REAL DAMN QUICK ;)
ringthree
04-18-2002, 12:06 PM
Oh yeah and his mom is a fluffer too.
someone please lock this.
ringthree
04-18-2002, 12:21 PM
Thats a great idea Zorn.
t2000gts
04-18-2002, 12:36 PM
http://subzero.mine.nu/files/dalock.gif
kaioshin
04-18-2002, 12:46 PM
Originally posted by t2000gts
http://subzero.mine.nu/files/dalock.gif
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
ringthree
04-18-2002, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by t2000gts
http://subzero.mine.nu/files/dalock.gif
Mega-:gay:
larryd
04-20-2002, 08:43 PM
wow.. who was that guy that went out to dinner with us allt hat one night then?? :)
BTW.. :closed:
Originally posted by ringthree
I take it back, Joe didn't run those times. He doesn't even exist. He's a figment of my imagination. A construct that I have created because I have always wanted to be slower than a GT
God I think I am so funny!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.