PDA

View Full Version : 2005 Honda NSX-R GT

aerospike2002
05-13-2005, 04:18 PM
Interesting...

http://www.supercars.net/cars/2005@$Honda@$NSX-R%20GTx.html

http://www.supercars.net/PicFetch?pic=2006_honda_nsx-r_gt-1.jpg

Maybe it's old news, but not to me.
DGibb
05-13-2005, 04:28 PM
Looks like a chopped NSX-R to me...
Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con
05-13-2005, 04:38 PM
They only made 5 of these in order to comply with some JGTC regulation

http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/nsx-r_gt.asp

http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/02/nsxrgt05_02.jpg
kimGT
05-13-2005, 05:19 PM
looks pretty sweet except for the F1 air scoop at the top. couldn't they have made the scoop more horizontal and flush with the roof?
AdamVIP
05-13-2005, 05:33 PM
Im still wondering if thell ever make a significant body style or engine change on an nsx.
cool2miketlu
05-13-2005, 06:03 PM
Old news.
Bunch of bodyparts adding weight and only have how many HP?
OneCrAzYAkAbInE
05-13-2005, 06:13 PM
that scoop looks gay
The Game
05-13-2005, 06:44 PM
Im still wondering if thell ever make a significant body style or engine change on an nsx.
they just went from a 3.0L to a 3.2L V6
aerospike2002
05-13-2005, 06:51 PM
My link was bad guys...I see it just led to a picture. I fixed it.
ar_00gts
05-13-2005, 08:36 PM
it going about 120mph and a bird flying into that scoop that would be great
Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con
05-13-2005, 09:35 PM
Im still wondering if thell ever make a significant body style or engine change on an nsx.
they just went from a 3.0L to a 3.2L V6



97 was when it got the 3.2L with 6spd tranny
Tuppuguy
05-13-2005, 10:56 PM
they all look the same to me
RookieGTS
05-13-2005, 10:57 PM
what a mess.. :ugh:
Bobbeh
05-14-2005, 12:14 PM
what a mess.. :ugh:

Indeedy.
cycocelica
05-14-2005, 02:50 PM
ugly as sin
SingleCamCivic
05-14-2005, 02:52 PM
Factory Gayness :gayfight:
LEE3
05-14-2005, 03:31 PM
never really got into the nsx's & this one looks like should have roof clearance printed on the side so you know what to drive under to rip that big ugly peice of shIIIIt scoop off. looks same except for body trim peices & ugly ass scoop to me.
marc
05-14-2005, 03:43 PM
Im still wondering if thell ever make a significant body style or engine change on an nsx.

yeah.

they cancelled it for next year.

that's pretty big to me.
AdamVIP
05-15-2005, 12:05 PM
It wont be a loss for the car community. I havent read one review that doesnt say you can buy something better for less money. I do admit that I personally like the exterior styling of the nsx (not the one from this thread). I think its good and sleek with good use of sharp lines.
Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con
05-15-2005, 04:52 PM
It wont be a loss for the car community. I havent read one review that doesnt say you can buy something better for less money. I do admit that I personally like the exterior styling of the nsx (not the one from this thread). I think its good and sleek with good use of sharp lines.


Stop saying stupid things. When the NSX came out in 91 it trounced the Ferrari's of the day, and did it for $60k. I will agree that for $90k it gets it's ass handed to it by several cars that are well bellow it in price point. But who cares, you don't have to buy one. It's still one hell of a good performing car for being a 15 year old design (which IMO is still good looking). But to say it's no loss to the car community is straight ignorance. I bet there's a lot of cars out there today that without the NSX wouldn't be .
AdamVIP
05-15-2005, 05:07 PM
I gave it props for style but it was overpriced and never performed like a car of that cost should. Perhaps I was a bit harsh. I take it back but still say the car isnt worth buying.
djm221
05-16-2005, 09:37 AM
I bet there's a lot of cars out there today that without the NSX wouldn't be .

Like what?
gilboman
05-16-2005, 11:02 AM
Stop saying stupid things. When the NSX came out in 91 it trounced the Ferrari's of the day, and did it for $60k. I will agree that for $90k it gets it's ass handed to it by several cars that are well bellow it in price point. But who cares, you don't have to buy one. It's still one hell of a good performing car for being a 15 year old design (which IMO is still good looking). But to say it's no loss to the car community is straight ignorance. I bet there's a lot of cars out there today that without the NSX wouldn't be .

newsflash, this is 2005 and NSX is stuck in 1991 ;) car was good in 1991, just like the Model T was good back in its day but means nothing in 2005
Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con
05-16-2005, 11:10 AM
I bet there's a lot of cars out there today that without the NSX wouldn't be .

Like what?


it made ferrari have to step it up.

Stop saying stupid things. When the NSX came out in 91 it trounced the Ferrari's of the day, and did it for $60k. I will agree that for $90k it gets it's ass handed to it by several cars that are well bellow it in price point. But who cares, you don't have to buy one. It's still one hell of a good performing car for being a 15 year old design (which IMO is still good looking). But to say it's no loss to the car community is straight ignorance. I bet there's a lot of cars out there today that without the NSX wouldn't be .

newsflash, this is 2005 and NSX is stuck in 1991 ;) car was good in 1991, just like the Model T was good back in its day but means nothing in 2005



newsflash, in 2005 sub 5 second 0-60 and > .90g's is still not slow.
AdamVIP
05-16-2005, 12:34 PM
but when you pay 90000 you expect it to be closer to the 4 sec range.
gilboman
05-16-2005, 01:20 PM
newsflash, in 2005 sub 5 second 0-60 and > .90g's is still not slow.

for the money it sure is
Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con
05-16-2005, 02:20 PM
but when you pay 90000 you expect it to be closer to the 4 sec range.



newsflash, in 2005 sub 5 second 0-60 and > .90g's is still not slow.

for the money it sure is



Oh, I'm not arguing the lack of bang for the buck. It's a 14 year old car. But being 14 years old it's still a nice car that has pretty good all around performance. I wouldn't mind driving one. But for my $90k I'd rather have a new 997, or C6 Z06. But the car isn't a POS.