ArchangelX
05-11-2002, 08:21 PM
Welps just picked up the car.
Only bad thing is, I have no juice..lol. It got used up during the tuning process...so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out how bad this mofo is..heh.
Anyways, their printer had a cow, so I've got the results on disc, but they're a dyno binary, so I can't exactly view them right now.
After they get their printer back online I'll finally get a scanned copy...anyways.
They used a Mustang Dnyamometer program with Inertia something or another technology.
The runs were not dyno corrected, and were with an estimated weight of 2,700. Before you freak out, I weigh about 200 pounds, so I wanted ON THE STREET results. The dyno uses an electromagnetic wheel to add "poundage" to force the engine to work as if it was rolling on the street.
LOL..it's amazing what a little weight loss can do for your car..heh.
I put down an 154 horses at the wheel without the 35 shot.
This is in comparison to my previous dyno of about 165 horses using SAE correction down in Sacramento... I asked Ray about this, and due to the type of dyno, and the fact that it's not corrected, he said it's gonna be a heckuva lot lower than my previous dyno.
When he ran it with the 35 shot, it jumped up to 189 horses at the wheel. Kinda strange cuz it's a 36hp increase instead of a 35, so who knows what the deal is.
Unfortunately, we didn't get to discuss the torque numbers at all, because I had to jet....but I'm taking it to a different dyno later on this week to get some SAE numbers for comparison for you guys. And for myself.
I didn't get to get any runs in, but he said he did about three runs up on the highway to make sure everything was dialed in. He said it kicked ass...so I believe him.
We'll see tomorrow..heh.
Another thing is that I haven't run with the 50 shot, cuz they ran out just tuning it for the 35. He said he thinks the engine could take a 50-60 shot no problem, but doesn't really like the idea of running a 75 on it.
Can anyone help me figure out what the numbers would be in SAE, for the moment?
I mean I could pretty much say that since it was a 36 horse increase, then just tack that on my previous dyno in Sacto, and it would be about 200 horses at the wheel...but we all know how iffy that type of reasoning is.
Only bad thing is, I have no juice..lol. It got used up during the tuning process...so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out how bad this mofo is..heh.
Anyways, their printer had a cow, so I've got the results on disc, but they're a dyno binary, so I can't exactly view them right now.
After they get their printer back online I'll finally get a scanned copy...anyways.
They used a Mustang Dnyamometer program with Inertia something or another technology.
The runs were not dyno corrected, and were with an estimated weight of 2,700. Before you freak out, I weigh about 200 pounds, so I wanted ON THE STREET results. The dyno uses an electromagnetic wheel to add "poundage" to force the engine to work as if it was rolling on the street.
LOL..it's amazing what a little weight loss can do for your car..heh.
I put down an 154 horses at the wheel without the 35 shot.
This is in comparison to my previous dyno of about 165 horses using SAE correction down in Sacramento... I asked Ray about this, and due to the type of dyno, and the fact that it's not corrected, he said it's gonna be a heckuva lot lower than my previous dyno.
When he ran it with the 35 shot, it jumped up to 189 horses at the wheel. Kinda strange cuz it's a 36hp increase instead of a 35, so who knows what the deal is.
Unfortunately, we didn't get to discuss the torque numbers at all, because I had to jet....but I'm taking it to a different dyno later on this week to get some SAE numbers for comparison for you guys. And for myself.
I didn't get to get any runs in, but he said he did about three runs up on the highway to make sure everything was dialed in. He said it kicked ass...so I believe him.
We'll see tomorrow..heh.
Another thing is that I haven't run with the 50 shot, cuz they ran out just tuning it for the 35. He said he thinks the engine could take a 50-60 shot no problem, but doesn't really like the idea of running a 75 on it.
Can anyone help me figure out what the numbers would be in SAE, for the moment?
I mean I could pretty much say that since it was a 36 horse increase, then just tack that on my previous dyno in Sacto, and it would be about 200 horses at the wheel...but we all know how iffy that type of reasoning is.