boost addict
01-05-2011, 11:25 AM
I’m a newbie to the forum but have been a Toyota guy for years, having owned two Celicas, two Supras, and a Tacoma. I’m new to the 7th gen Celica and have found a low mileage 2000 GT-S 6 speed that I’m interested in. After browsing this forum I think have a good feel for problem areas and issues I need to look for when 7th gen shopping.
After taking an extensive test drive in the 2000 I’ve found, I can’t find any issues other than a check engine light that I found out to be code P0172. After cleaning the MAF sensor and resetting the ECU, the light & code did not return. Car runs smooth from idle to redline.
I know the past is unknown as far as how this particular vehicles transmission has been treated, but the car is 100% stock and in good shape otherwise with no signs of abuse and less than 50k miles. Are year 2000 6-speed manual transmissions destined for syncro failure regardless if they are treated naughty or nice, even if you change the fluid at regular intervals and don’t slam the gears at redline every time you hit the starter? I know the shifter gate and gears/syncros were revised a few years in, but do they still hold up over time if not thrashed on?
The 2000 GT-S I’ve found shifts well for a FWD vehicle with a cable actuated setup (I’m used to rear wheel drive vehicles with direct link shifters). Smooth upshifts up to redline as well as downshifts – no grinding or resistance.
I really liked how the car ran, drove, and handled. My only concern is the transmission having early issues down the road and having to deal with that. I’m used to putting well over 100K miles on my manual vehicles with no transmission issues. For example, I have an ’86 300ZX as a daily driver with 182K and other than a new clutch and regular fluid changes, the transmission hasn’t been touched and it still shifts great.
After taking an extensive test drive in the 2000 I’ve found, I can’t find any issues other than a check engine light that I found out to be code P0172. After cleaning the MAF sensor and resetting the ECU, the light & code did not return. Car runs smooth from idle to redline.
I know the past is unknown as far as how this particular vehicles transmission has been treated, but the car is 100% stock and in good shape otherwise with no signs of abuse and less than 50k miles. Are year 2000 6-speed manual transmissions destined for syncro failure regardless if they are treated naughty or nice, even if you change the fluid at regular intervals and don’t slam the gears at redline every time you hit the starter? I know the shifter gate and gears/syncros were revised a few years in, but do they still hold up over time if not thrashed on?
The 2000 GT-S I’ve found shifts well for a FWD vehicle with a cable actuated setup (I’m used to rear wheel drive vehicles with direct link shifters). Smooth upshifts up to redline as well as downshifts – no grinding or resistance.
I really liked how the car ran, drove, and handled. My only concern is the transmission having early issues down the road and having to deal with that. I’m used to putting well over 100K miles on my manual vehicles with no transmission issues. For example, I have an ’86 300ZX as a daily driver with 182K and other than a new clutch and regular fluid changes, the transmission hasn’t been touched and it still shifts great.