AWD 2ZZ Celica - Page 2 - NewCelica.org Forum
  
Install Guides Parts Catalog Gallery Tech Info

Go Back   NewCelica.org Forum > Celica Discussion > Fabrication Forum

Fabrication Forum Welding, metal working, and general engineering of parts

Support NCO
Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2013, 06:24 PM   #51
bt216
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,307
iTrader: (69)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shizuma View Post
Keep in mind you have a gas tank back there somewhere too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by de1phi View Post
bt216 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-28-2013, 07:22 AM   #52
gts19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 83
iTrader: (0)
I probably wouldn't dig out that much of the gas tank, and where is the exhaust?
gts19 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 07:33 AM   #53
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
That looks like a factory gas tank

IM thinking it might be easier to just get a whole Caldina imported

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-28-2013, 08:05 AM   #54
GSBoek
Daddy Daycare
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao
Posts: 20,263
iTrader: (7)
Yep, factory gas tank from a
Quote:
Originally Posted by de1phi View Post
corolla fielder zze124
__________________
Links geboren, rechts getogen.


202 CREW ........................... No. 30002
GSBoek is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 01:53 PM   #55
mrfunny107
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,305
iTrader: (9)
why dont you just look at the fensport celica GT4x on their website. They have alot of good photos
__________________

Too much.....
mrfunny107 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2013, 06:13 AM   #56
narly charley
Poopin' on Scrubz
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: N Illinois
Posts: 3,740
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfunny107 View Post
why dont you just look at the fensport celica GT4x on their website. They have alot of good photos
x2
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfunny107 View Post
I am a small Asian person

narly charley is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2013, 06:15 AM   #57
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Re: AWD 2ZZ Celica

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfunny107 View Post
why dont you just look at the fensport celica GT4x on their website. They have alot of good photos






Quote:
Originally Posted by narly charley View Post
x2
I will look into that


Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 01:35 AM   #58
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
I took a look, nice pictures, they used the rear end out of a AWD Corrolla, which i have never heard of and made some custom brackets that were welded in and what not. Im really searching for something more bolt in.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 10:55 AM   #59
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
I found a couple of awd matrix and vibe rear clips and rear sub assemblies. Going to call Monday and see what they come with and cost to ship. Get this project going

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 08:58 AM   #60
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
I found the key components not far from me. Hopefully have them by January. Sad part is I wont be able to install them till March.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:05 AM   #61
andreww
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 452
iTrader: (6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gts*Jason View Post
I found the key components not far from me. Hopefully have them by January. Sad part is I wont be able to install them till March.
Matrix AWD?
__________________
2001 GT
andreww is online now   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:21 AM   #62
Celicasaur
Bring on the 12's...
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 6,081
iTrader: (23)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gts*Jason View Post
I took a look, nice pictures, they used the rear end out of a AWD Corrolla, which i have never heard of and made some custom brackets that were welded in and what not. Im really searching for something more bolt in.
...for that Corolla they used an ST205.

Infact, that Corolla is an ST205 with just a Corolla chassis.
__________________
Celicasaur wishlist for 2014:
DDPR manifold
3" exhaust system
Goals for 2014:
12's!


Quote:
Originally Posted by 2way View Post
While your speaking to your clergy about marriage ceremony, see if he does exorcisms.
Celicasaur is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:21 AM   #63
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreww View Post
Matrix AWD?
Matrix or a Vibe I didnt ask which but since they are the same it doesnt matter.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 11:46 AM   #64
v3bahumut
O_o
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LaVergne, TN
Posts: 7,222
iTrader: (46)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gts*Jason View Post
I found the key components not far from me. Hopefully have them by January. Sad part is I wont be able to install them till March.
You need to go ahead and hurry up so I can copy you when it works.
__________________

-2001 GT-T 6 speed-
-2001 4Runner Sr5 4x4-
-1974 VW Baja Beetle-
v3bahumut is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 12:00 PM   #65
andreww
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 452
iTrader: (6)
^
__________________
2001 GT
andreww is online now   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 12:04 PM   #66
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Re: AWD 2ZZ Celica

Quote:
Originally Posted by v3bahumut View Post
You need to go ahead and hurry up so I can copy you when it works.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andreww View Post
^
I don't keep any secrets. What I know I'll make sure to share. Well everything except where these parts I need are currently located.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 12:58 PM   #67
GSBoek
Daddy Daycare
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao
Posts: 20,263
iTrader: (7)
__________________
Links geboren, rechts getogen.


202 CREW ........................... No. 30002
GSBoek is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:39 PM   #68
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celicasaur View Post
...for that Corolla they used an ST205.

Infact, that Corolla is an ST205 with just a Corolla chassis.
Im going with the ST246 rear diff if i can get one. Otherwise beefing up the matrix rear diff will need to be looked at
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 05:25 AM   #69
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Also, the matrix rear diff isn't cheap, people are trying to sell a broke one for 250 bucks and a good used one for 600. That's more than any other part I plan on buying except for the MWR e153 kit. You can get an awd transmission for less that that

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 09:51 PM   #70
Boosted2.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15,564
iTrader: (19)
Blog Entries: 1
IMO that Matrix rear end is not a great choice from a durability / use-ability standpoint. It has a weird electric clutch on the front you have to apply to get it to work.

I would look at Caldina GT4 parts.
__________________
Talk to us for all your performance needs!
We specialize in Motor builds, tuning, custom fabrication, high end / high HP engines, intake manifolds, exhaust manifolds, suspension, custom wiring, custom turbos, tuning, etc. We can get any part you want, usually for less than you would expect!

WWW.DDPerformanceResearch.com
Boosted2.0 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 10:00 PM   #71
Bitter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago-south
Posts: 8,242
iTrader: (10)
Matrix isn't full time AWD, it's part time isn't it? That's why the rear diff is wimpy, it's just there to help the car out sometimes as needed, not to actually propel it.
__________________
2000 Celica GT-S 'slowest GT-S evar'
1998 Mazda 626 FS-DE/CD4E 'mom-mobile'
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCMiller View Post
I'm gay
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundman98
no, don't even waste your time. if you want a honest sticker, at least get one that says "objects in mirror aren't really racing, so quit trying"...
Bitter is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 01:28 AM   #72
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosted2.0 View Post
IMO that Matrix rear end is not a great choice from a durability / use-ability standpoint. It has a weird electric clutch on the front you have to apply to get it to work.

I would look at Caldina GT4 parts.
Here is a post worth reading. Good info. Any thing you can show to back that statement up though. I have looked around and the rear diff does not have anything electric going to it. Im not saying that it isnt a weak rear end, but it would get me closer, faster to making an awd celica since that is the subframe im using. If there is an electric clutch ill eventually just get a ST246. Maybe try a ST205 diff since they are a dime a dozen around the states. Shit I can get a E154F trans with the rear diff and drive shaft for the price of one used matrix diff

Last edited by Gts*Jason; 12-07-2013 at 01:40 AM..
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 08:23 AM   #73
Bitter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago-south
Posts: 8,242
iTrader: (10)
The Matrix rear axle assembly has a viscous coupling and an open differential inside. What this means for you? The rear axle is only transmitting power to the rear wheels when the front wheels turn faster than the rear and in that case the rear will only be able to provide positive traction at one wheel. What does this mean for performance? Absolutely nothing unless you're already spinning wheels on a regular basis, if that's the case then a set of Dunlop Z2's are much cheaper than this endeavor. So is a limited slip differential for your stock transmission. This Matrix rear axle isn't like what you think it is, what you're thinking of a is symmetric AWD like an Evo, GT4 or WRX where front and rear axles get equal power or have the ability to receive equal power or there's a capability to route power (via computer controls) to the wheels which have the most traction. You'll have a FWD car that if it slips the front wheels can turn the back wheels a little bit for assistance. This kind of partial AWD is good for situations like being in the snow. That's pretty much it. That's what Toyota was marketing towards in Japan when they launched it. An economical mid size (in Japan) wagon with a lot of room inside, a good engine, and partial AWD to get you around when it's snowed in the northern areas and mountain areas. It was never designed as a performance enhancement.
__________________
2000 Celica GT-S 'slowest GT-S evar'
1998 Mazda 626 FS-DE/CD4E 'mom-mobile'
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCMiller View Post
I'm gay
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundman98
no, don't even waste your time. if you want a honest sticker, at least get one that says "objects in mirror aren't really racing, so quit trying"...
Bitter is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 09:22 AM   #74
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitter View Post
What does this mean for performance? Absolutely nothing unless you're already spinning wheels on a regular basis, if that's the case then a set of Dunlop Z2's are much cheaper than this endeavor. So is a limited slip differential for your stock transmission. You'll have a FWD car that if it slips the front wheels can turn the back wheels a little bit for assistance. This kind of partial AWD is good for situations like being in the snow.It was never designed as a performance enhancement.
I run race slicks most days and still have traction problems, also my LSD helps but just isnt enough to keep the power down like I would want it. While I do agree that it isnt the best idea for performance but it would help keep the car accelerating and provide traction when the front is slipping. It might not be a long term solution for some looking for high HP strictly performance setups but it would make the celica a functional AWD platform and be an improvement from just your basic FWD.

Viscous is better than an electrically engaged clutch any day of the week. ST246 LSD rear diff is the long term HP performance solution that ill seek after i get everything else worked out and mounted up.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 09:40 AM   #75
Boosted2.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15,564
iTrader: (19)
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gts*Jason View Post
Here is a post worth reading. Good info. Any thing you can show to back that statement up though. I have looked around and the rear diff does not have anything electric going to it. Im not saying that it isnt a weak rear end, but it would get me closer, faster to making an awd celica since that is the subframe im using. If there is an electric clutch ill eventually just get a ST246. Maybe try a ST205 diff since they are a dime a dozen around the states. Shit I can get a E154F trans with the rear diff and drive shaft for the price of one used matrix diff
Check out the 2009 Matrix New car features and it talks about it.

They were viscous couplings from 04-08 so I guess one of them would work as long as you use a trans that doesn't have a viscous coupling in the center diff, which the Celica GT4/alltrac/Caldina transmissions all do.

Personally I would rather just use a Caldina diff since they are a straightforward mechanical diff.
__________________
Talk to us for all your performance needs!
We specialize in Motor builds, tuning, custom fabrication, high end / high HP engines, intake manifolds, exhaust manifolds, suspension, custom wiring, custom turbos, tuning, etc. We can get any part you want, usually for less than you would expect!

WWW.DDPerformanceResearch.com
Boosted2.0 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 10:04 AM   #76
Bitter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago-south
Posts: 8,242
iTrader: (10)
It sounds more like a driver and car setup problem. If you're putting down appreciably more than a stock 1ZZ output you'll end up overheating (and breaking) the viscous coupling pretty easily. I think you're trying to fix a problem by adding more complexity isn't the way to go. Look at anti-lift front suspension geometry to help with launching.
__________________
2000 Celica GT-S 'slowest GT-S evar'
1998 Mazda 626 FS-DE/CD4E 'mom-mobile'
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCMiller View Post
I'm gay
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundman98
no, don't even waste your time. if you want a honest sticker, at least get one that says "objects in mirror aren't really racing, so quit trying"...
Bitter is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 12:38 AM   #77
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosted2.0 View Post
Check out the 2009 Matrix New car features and it talks about it.

They were viscous couplings from 04-08 so I guess one of them would work as long as you use a trans that doesn't have a viscous coupling in the center diff, which the Celica GT4/alltrac/Caldina transmissions all do.

Personally I would rather just use a Caldina diff since they are a straightforward mechanical diff.
With that bit of info now i know i have to go with a different diff bc it wont work with Matrix rear end bc of the transmission I plan on using. Thanks for the extremely useful info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitter View Post
It sounds more like a driver and car setup problem. If you're putting down appreciably more than a stock 1ZZ output you'll end up overheating (and breaking) the viscous coupling pretty easily. I think you're trying to fix a problem by adding more complexity isn't the way to go. Look at anti-lift front suspension geometry to help with launching.
Im just trying to build the first AWD 2ZZ Celica and do it in the most efficent and effective manner. Im not trying to fix anything bc the car works as a FWD platform. I just want the rear tires to turn under the power of the motor as project that way I have something to do in free time.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 06:35 AM   #78
Boosted2.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15,564
iTrader: (19)
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gts*Jason View Post
With that bit of info now i know i have to go with a different diff bc it wont work with Matrix rear end bc of the transmission I plan on using. Thanks for the extremely useful info.
No problem. I'm excited that someone that actually has a chance of accomplishing this is interested in it. It should be a cool swap.
__________________
Talk to us for all your performance needs!
We specialize in Motor builds, tuning, custom fabrication, high end / high HP engines, intake manifolds, exhaust manifolds, suspension, custom wiring, custom turbos, tuning, etc. We can get any part you want, usually for less than you would expect!

WWW.DDPerformanceResearch.com
Boosted2.0 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 09:31 AM   #79
mrfunny107
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,305
iTrader: (9)
^

We need some innovation back into the celica. Its nice to know someone is serious about actually doing it.

But still no love for my rally light pod.
__________________

Too much.....
mrfunny107 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 09:43 AM   #80
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Re: AWD 2ZZ Celica

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosted2.0 View Post
No problem. I'm excited that someone that actually has a chance of accomplishing this is interested in it. It should be a cool swap.
It should be added that I'm trying to make it a easy as possible
So that everyone can do it. Bolt in is key for this project




Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfunny107 View Post
^

We need some innovation back into the celica. Its nice to know someone is serious about actually doing it.

But still no love for my rally light pod.
No way that thing is getting bolted to my hood

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 12:07 AM   #81
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
The wife is heading over to the junk yard beginning of next week to make sure none of the parts have been wrecked before she pays and has them shipped to the house. Exciting to get the parts but not so much since I wont be able to do anything with them till February or March.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 03:16 PM   #82
coder02
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: florida
Posts: 77
iTrader: (0)
I've been interested in this possibility since the 7th gen first came out. I always felt like AWD was a defining attribute that made the previous generation Celica something special. It's something that just makes a car so much more fun to drive -I would imagine that for guys that have achieved really high horsepower numbers, the added traction would be a whole new dimension of performance, especially for road course driving.

I love that someone is making the attempt to make this mod accessible to a larger part of the community. We've all seen pictures of the 3sgte AWD swaps, but the lack of detailed information has kept the mod in the realm of custom shops and their customers. Also, for several reasons, I think keeping the 2zz is a better way to go, and I'm glad that's the plan here.

I believe that it's probably not as hard as it seems to do most of the steps involved in this. I'm hoping it can be made into a bolt on process with some drilling involved, but hopefully welding can be avoided other than fabricating some brackets. I know someone who would probably do small runs of these brackets.

I thought it was worth re-posting these pictures from de1phi's 3sgte swap thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by de1phi View Post


I'm guessing the fabrication of the driveshaft support brackets will be completely or nearly identical for this project. I'd be happy to make blueprints or drawings for any custom brackets that we could post up so that others could more easily build them in the future once the dimensions are known. I think de1phi did a really good job -the only thing I think could be improved a little would be cutting out a plate of sheet metal to replace those washers on the bolts on the inside of the car. It would spread the load out a little more and make it less likely that area and the washers would get stretched or deformed over time.

There will have to be some type of custom bracket or standoff made to raise the steering rack high enough on the firewall to position it above the driveshaft so it will fit, but these will probably be simple to construct as well, and from what I could tell, they could potentially still mount to the original steering rack bolt holes if shaped the right way to allow it. As a result, I'm guessing the steering tie rods will have to be extended to reach far enough and while actually extending them is trivial, I see that there could potentially be a problem with the sway bar being in their way. I bet some existing off the shelf power steering hose with the right fittings could be found that would bolt right in and allow the existing hard lines to simply be removed.

As for the rear end, I really hope the matrix rear crossmember just bolts right up. If it does, I wouldn't be surprised if you could still use the celica rear control arms and just switch the hubs out -and that brings me to the next point-

I can confirm that at least in the case of a non-AWD matrix, the hubs are are 100% direct bolt on part for the celica rear knuckles. I had bought a celica gts rear crossmember for some parts, but I did not need the brakes or hubs, so I sold them to a buddy for him to put on his matrix. I helped him put them on and the hubs were completely interchangeable with no problems. His car was not an AWD matrix, so I just want to make that clear, but if the hub bolt pattern for those four bolts that attach it to the knuckle is the same for the matrix between AWD and non-AWD, then we can call the interchangeability between the matrix and celica hubs confirmed.

It might also be worth adding that the actual hub/bearing component is removable from the brake backing plate, so it might be possible to simply swap the celica hub for the matrix one when doing the conversion. I think it's worth figuring out whether little things like that are possible as you go through the process because it would allow more parts from the celica to be reused and make it easier for people to complete the conversion with the least amount of new parts as possible.
coder02 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 01:26 AM   #83
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Thanks for the info about the rear hubs, all the part numbers back there cross so its not a big concern. The big concern is getting the diff in with minimal mods, the axle shafts in with minimal mods, and the front steering rack in with minimal mods. As for the drive shaft I have not decided if I want to multi piece the drive shaft like a stock unit or use a custom one piece unit I could have built here locally. I'm not sure how the length of the stock unit is going to fit or if will even the transmission and rear diff. First thing is first, getting the rear to take a rear diff. When that is done Ill tackle the front. When that is done Ill figure the driveshaft. Its process, especially when you are trying to document everything so the process can be repeated.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 06:57 AM   #84
andreww
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 452
iTrader: (6)
So are you planning on using the front transmission from the AWD matrix? Because I'm wondering if it has the same 'small gear failure' problem as the C60 does, which would be a painful thing to deal with after going through all of this work.
__________________
2001 GT
andreww is online now   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 10:09 AM   #85
GSBoek
Daddy Daycare
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao
Posts: 20,263
iTrader: (7)
He's using an E154. The Matrix AWD transmission reportedly doesn't hold much power anyway.
__________________
Links geboren, rechts getogen.


202 CREW ........................... No. 30002

Last edited by GSBoek; 12-12-2013 at 10:16 AM..
GSBoek is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 10:34 AM   #86
andreww
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 452
iTrader: (6)
and the E154 will work with MWRs E153 conversion kit? Or is he going to have to fab a converter plate for it? In any case, holy crap would having an AWD powerhouse celica kick ass.
__________________
2001 GT
andreww is online now   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 10:42 AM   #87
GSBoek
Daddy Daycare
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao
Posts: 20,263
iTrader: (7)
That's the plan as far as I understood.
__________________
Links geboren, rechts getogen.


202 CREW ........................... No. 30002
GSBoek is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 11:09 AM   #88
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreww View Post
So are you planning on using the front transmission from the AWD matrix? Because I'm wondering if it has the same 'small gear failure' problem as the C60 does, which would be a painful thing to deal with after going through all of this work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSBoek View Post
He's using an E154. The Matrix AWD transmission reportedly doesn't hold much power anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreww View Post
and the E154 will work with MWRs E153 conversion kit? Or is he going to have to fab a converter plate for it? In any case, holy crap would having an AWD powerhouse celica kick ass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSBoek View Post
That's the plan as far as I understood.
The E154F transmission bolts up to the 3S-gte motor which the E153 bolts to. Reason would lead me to believe that bc both of these transmissions use the same bell housing that they would both bolt up with the same kit. The really only difference between the 154 and 153 is the 154 has the addition of a viscous coupler installed to where the passenger axle would go. This provides the coupling for the driveshaft to the rear end. It should hold the same power levels as the 153 but I wont be touching the limits or getting any where close bc I am basicly running a stock boosted motor. From pictures everything looks like it is going to fit very well except for the steering rack. Wont know for sure till I get it all purchased and mocked up.

Here is my build plan:
12/20/2013 Purchase the rear sub assembly minus the diff of a AWD Matrix
3/01/2014 Attempt the install of Matrix rear sub assembly
3-4/2014 Purchase and install Caldina rear diff
4-6/2014 Purchase E154F trans and MWR E153 kit
7/2014 Mock up MWR kit and E154F transmission make steer rack adjustments and have drive shaft built and build custom turbo back exhaust
11/2014 Do a final install and enjoy an AWD Celica

Its going to take some time with my schedule and I plan on doing a wire tuck so I can run a larger air to water intercooler at some point. Turbo is going to have to flipped and pipes rerouted. Its going to be a chore but as long as nothing goes real bad it should get done in the next year.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 11:12 AM   #89
andreww
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 452
iTrader: (6)
Cool, that's what I was hoping to hear.

I really, REALLY can't wait to see the finished product of this, because I will probably do it in the future if it works well for you. Soooooooooo exciiteddddd.
__________________
2001 GT
andreww is online now   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 12:08 PM   #90
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
If I can get this 90%bolt up I might take them on as jobs for customers. Reincorporate myself and open my shop back up on a very limited and select basis.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2013, 04:24 PM   #91
coder02
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: florida
Posts: 77
iTrader: (0)
I had a chance to get under my friend's matrix to take another look at the rear subframe/crossmember with a measuring tape and compare to my celica side by side.

The control arms seem to be in all respects identical to the celica both in the dimensions of the points where they mount to the crossmember and also where they mount to the knuckle. It seems based on what I saw that the control arms and knuckles are probably interchangeable/identical between the matrix and celica and if there's any difference at all in size, it was too small for me to measure. No surprise here I guess, but confirmed nonetheless. The upper control arms have small holes in them that are unused on the celica, but on the matrix, it's used to hold a clip for the brake line, which I think shows quite clearly that this is an identical part for both cars.

The rear crossmember geometry is surprisingly different between the two cars. While the control arm mounting points have the same geometry/relative positions for both cars, the similarities end there. There is only one cross beam on the celica crossmember assembly, while the matrix has two giving it a much more robust construction to handle torque at the rear wheels. I measured the rear crossmember mounting points on both cars, and the celica's are spaced more widely.

The front mounting points of the matrix crossmember would place them in an area on the celica near the edges of the rear wheel well where it doesn't look like anything is in the way, but the area might have to be reshaped to accept these forward mounting points. They are not very close to the original celica forward mounting points at all.

Another small note: the matrix rear subframe seems to be held on by studs and nuts instead of bolts like on the celica. I know that doesn't matter much, but it couldn't hurt to tell about it.

The matrix crossmember is a few inches "taller" than the celica's -in other words, the distance between the control arm mounting points and the body of the car is greater on the matrix than the celica. If it were possible to bolt up the matrix crossmember to the celica, the rear end of the car would be sitting quite a bit higher unless something was modified to counteract this. I guess this "height" difference makes sense since the celica is a car that sits lower/has a lower ride height.

My conclusion from looking and measuring today is that the rear crossmembers/subframes are clearly not bolt-up interchangeable. It looks to me like some sort of hybrid fabrication involving cutting up and merging the two different assemblies from the celica and another car is probably going to be the way forward. Based on this observation, I think it's worth looking into the rear crossmember of the caldina to see if it's better suited to a cut-and-merge fabrication. One advantage it has from the start is that it's sure to fit your differential of choice while I'm not sure if it's know yet if the differential mounts of the matrix crossmember will accept the caldina diff without modifications.

Maybe you already knew about everything I had to say here, but I hope that at least if nothing else, a hands on confirmation will give you more confidence in your research. If there's something else that you want me to measure or look at for you on the matrix, I could probably get access to the car again pretty quickly. I would have posted some pictures from what I looked at today, but it was dark out and the shop light wasn't enough for my phone's crappy camera to focus even with the flash on.
coder02 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2013, 05:26 PM   #92
StrikerFury
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 3,374
iTrader: (4)
Send a message via AIM to StrikerFury Send a message via MSN to StrikerFury
Should have taken pictures!
__________________
This forum sucks
StrikerFury is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2013, 06:40 PM   #93
coder02
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: florida
Posts: 77
iTrader: (0)
sorry man, I tried to get pictures, but it wasn't worth cluttering up this thread with the garbage that came out on my phone -all you can see is a bunch of black out of focus mess and the tape measure in the foreground glowing super bright. I'll have to redo the process during the day to get usable pictures. I'm more than willing to do it again if there's a need to see the differences in detail.

I found the parts diagram images for them, and hopefully that will help for now.

The difference is pretty big and you can see most of what I was talking about in these pretty well.





coder02 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2013, 12:20 AM   #94
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coder02 View Post
I had a chance to get under my friend's matrix to take another look at the rear subframe/crossmember with a measuring tape and compare to my celica side by side.

The control arms seem to be in all respects identical to the celica both in the dimensions of the points where they mount to the crossmember and also where they mount to the knuckle. It seems based on what I saw that the control arms and knuckles are probably interchangeable/identical between the matrix and celica and if there's any difference at all in size, it was too small for me to measure. No surprise here I guess, but confirmed nonetheless. The upper control arms have small holes in them that are unused on the celica, but on the matrix, it's used to hold a clip for the brake line, which I think shows quite clearly that this is an identical part for both cars.

The rear crossmember geometry is surprisingly different between the two cars. While the control arm mounting points have the same geometry/relative positions for both cars, the similarities end there. There is only one cross beam on the celica crossmember assembly, while the matrix has two giving it a much more robust construction to handle torque at the rear wheels. I measured the rear crossmember mounting points on both cars, and the celica's are spaced more widely.

The front mounting points of the matrix crossmember would place them in an area on the celica near the edges of the rear wheel well where it doesn't look like anything is in the way, but the area might have to be reshaped to accept these forward mounting points. They are not very close to the original celica forward mounting points at all.

Another small note: the matrix rear subframe seems to be held on by studs and nuts instead of bolts like on the celica. I know that doesn't matter much, but it couldn't hurt to tell about it.

The matrix crossmember is a few inches "taller" than the celica's -in other words, the distance between the control arm mounting points and the body of the car is greater on the matrix than the celica. If it were possible to bolt up the matrix crossmember to the celica, the rear end of the car would be sitting quite a bit higher unless something was modified to counteract this. I guess this "height" difference makes sense since the celica is a car that sits lower/has a lower ride height.

My conclusion from looking and measuring today is that the rear crossmembers/subframes are clearly not bolt-up interchangeable. It looks to me like some sort of hybrid fabrication involving cutting up and merging the two different assemblies from the celica and another car is probably going to be the way forward. Based on this observation, I think it's worth looking into the rear crossmember of the caldina to see if it's better suited to a cut-and-merge fabrication. One advantage it has from the start is that it's sure to fit your differential of choice while I'm not sure if it's know yet if the differential mounts of the matrix crossmember will accept the caldina diff without modifications.

Maybe you already knew about everything I had to say here, but I hope that at least if nothing else, a hands on confirmation will give you more confidence in your research. If there's something else that you want me to measure or look at for you on the matrix, I could probably get access to the car again pretty quickly. I would have posted some pictures from what I looked at today, but it was dark out and the shop light wasn't enough for my phone's crappy camera to focus even with the flash on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coder02 View Post
sorry man, I tried to get pictures, but it wasn't worth cluttering up this thread with the garbage that came out on my phone -all you can see is a bunch of black out of focus mess and the tape measure in the foreground glowing super bright. I'll have to redo the process during the day to get usable pictures. I'm more than willing to do it again if there's a need to see the differences in detail.

I found the parts diagram images for them, and hopefully that will help for now.

The difference is pretty big and you can see most of what I was talking about in these pretty well.






Thanks for all that info. VERY VERY HELPFUL. My next move is to get both of the assmbled rear sub frames out and next to each other to see what the differences are. This project might just stop there. But if its matter of making spacers and reinforcing plates to mount some shit Ill keep going.

As for the calidina stuff, that was orignially my go to but getting here to the states is going to very expensive and hard to get. I have contacted many "importers" with no response. I am getting a great a deal on the matrix stuff so chopping it up wont hurt my feelings.

edit: I can always just take the diff carrier assembly off of the matrix rear sub and weld that to my Celica sub frame and reinforce that. Like I stated earlier, at this point I just need to get them side by side to take measurements and see what way I want to go. The rear assembly is what, for me IMO, is going to make or break this project.

Last edited by Gts*Jason; 12-14-2013 at 02:49 AM..
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 06:18 PM   #95
vegeta4ss
12+ years daily driver
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 8,599
iTrader: (106)
You may want to try Nad Auto for your Caldina stuff. they're somewhere around Atlanta. My buddy bought lots of front clips from them for projects at his Raleigh shop so I know they are legit. No telling what the cost would be though.

Looking forward to seeing how this progresses along for you.
__________________
01 gt-s - owned since 2002. 217,000 miles still mostly a daily driver.

Vintage Gamer - Will trade OEM and aftermarket spare parts for your old Sega and Nintendo carts.
vegeta4ss is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 02:00 PM   #96
Boosted2.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15,564
iTrader: (19)
Blog Entries: 1
Hey Jason, just had a thought - are you sure the E154F has the same center diff ratio as a Caldina? I would imagine they are, but I don't know it for sure.
__________________
Talk to us for all your performance needs!
We specialize in Motor builds, tuning, custom fabrication, high end / high HP engines, intake manifolds, exhaust manifolds, suspension, custom wiring, custom turbos, tuning, etc. We can get any part you want, usually for less than you would expect!

WWW.DDPerformanceResearch.com
Boosted2.0 is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2013, 03:45 AM   #97
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Re: AWD 2ZZ Celica

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosted2.0 View Post
Hey Jason, just had a thought - are you sure the E154F has the same center diff ratio as a Caldina? I would imagine they are, but I don't know it for sure.
I have no idea, I'll look that up.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
202 CREW ................................................. No. 2
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2013, 04:19 AM   #98
GSBoek
Daddy Daycare
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao
Posts: 20,263
iTrader: (7)
The older ST215 Caldina used the E150F transmission. The newer ST246 is automatic only and uses the U140F, if that helps.
__________________
Links geboren, rechts getogen.


202 CREW ........................... No. 30002
GSBoek is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2013, 04:36 AM   #99
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSBoek View Post
The older ST215 Caldina used the E150F transmission. The newer ST246 is automatic only and uses the U140F, if that helps.
Yep, just googled that shit and came back with the same info. I guess Ill use the 150 instead of the 154
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2013, 04:37 AM   #100
Gts*Jason
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Muddy Ford, FL
Posts: 1,456
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegeta4ss View Post
You may want to try Nad Auto for your Caldina stuff. they're somewhere around Atlanta. My buddy bought lots of front clips from them for projects at his Raleigh shop so I know they are legit. No telling what the cost would be though.

Looking forward to seeing how this progresses along for you.
I sent them an email, hopefully they send me a reply soon.
Gts*Jason is offline   View this Members' Photo Gallery Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Go Back   NewCelica.org Forum > Celica Discussion > Fabrication Forum

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.

vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.