NewCelica.org Forum banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
52,878 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/01/AR2008080103570.html
Quick Checks for Violators Improve Officers' Efficiency but Worry ACLU

The two softball-size cameras on top of Maryland State Police Cpl. Mike Cox's unmarked cruiser trained in on the license plates whizzing by when, "Bam!" The small computer screen inside Cox's car flashed red.

Like clockwork, Cox flipped on his lights and pulled over the van. Then he slapped the driver with a $140 ticket for a suspended tag resulting from a failed emissions inspection.

A camera had snapped the plate number on his company's van, along with hundreds of others along Charles County's roadways, and run it through the Motor Vehicle Administration database.

Initially purchased to find stolen cars, a handful of so-called tag readers are in use across the Washington region to catch not just car thieves, but also drivers who neglected or failed their emissions inspections or let their insurance policies lapse. The District and Prince George's County use them to enforce parking rules.

Police say the readers, which scan every license plate they pass and run the tag numbers through state or federal criminal databases, are invaluable in recovering stolen cars and catching crooks.

"Anywhere you go, it gets 'em. Anywhere," said Cox. "This thing's unreal."

Critics argue, though, that the cameras are the latest piece of invasive surveillance equipment entering the market without adequate regulation.

In most cases, police do not tell the people being pulled over that a machine, not an officer, ran their tags, officials said. Unless, of course, the person being pulled over asks, "Did I do anything wrong for you to run my tag?" Cox said.

But to Cox, the mobile plate hunter, as it is sometimes called, is more fair than he is.

"It runs everyone that gets within its camera view," he said.

On a recent afternoon, Cox demonstrated how the tag reader technology works. In just a few hours on patrol, the cameras ran more than 1,600 license plates, allowing him to issue two warnings and the $140 ticket.

Every few seconds in Cox's unmarked car, the computer screen beeps at him. A license plate number, caught on camera, appears with information about the vehicle it is attached to. When there's a problem with the plate number, the screen turns red. When a stolen car is located, the reader makes a noise like a machine gun.

Sometimes, Cox just sits in his stopped car, letting traffic pass him. Other times, he cruises along, waiting for a hit he is sure will come.

"Cadillac. Vehicle emissions. See how fast something happens?" Cox said, flipping on his cruiser lights to pull over the Cadillac as his screen flashes red.

Most of the tag readers in Maryland, which cost about $25,000 a unit, are paid for by the Maryland Vehicle Theft Prevention Council, a state organization dedicated to reducing auto theft. The council has purchased seven for the state police, seven for Prince George's County police and at least one for every other county between Harford and Charles -- save Howard, which bought its own, said W. Ray Presley, the council's executive director.

D.C. police have 10 tag readers, and they are used to find stolen cars and catch parking scofflaws. The Virginia State Police have five, though they only recently started using one on routine patrol, spokeswoman Corinne Geller said. The rest have been used in special operations, she said.

Police say there is no question that the tag readers are worth the expense. Prince George's police recovered 400 cars last year using the readers, equal to about $3.7 million, said Maj. Robert Liberati of the county's patrol enforcement division.

Charles County police have recovered 69 stolen vehicles and made 29 arrests in the 1 1/2 years since the sheriff's office began using a tag reader, said Charles Baker, senior detective in the auto theft unit. He said he likes the tool because it allows him to keep his eyes on the road instead of wasting time punching license plate numbers into a computer.

"I just think it makes us a lot more effective and a lot more efficient in how our time is being used," he said. "You can do three to four thousand [license plates] a day with that."

Although police and civil liberties attorneys debate the merits of running that volume of plates, there is one point no one disputes: It is only a matter of time before the tag readers are replaced by more sophisticated technology.



on the one hand, I like that the reader helps the officer(s) do their job more efficiently, but there is certainly room for abuse. what say you?

Discuss. :eatpop:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,169 Posts
I say Big Brother can kiss my ass :thumbdown

This is NOT a more effective use of police time -- it's just more COST effective.

Now every cop can be a "meter maid", slapping tickets on everyone with expired paperwork :jerkoff:
 

·
Boobze
Joined
·
3,237 Posts
i'm all for cost effectiveness considering

A) I pay their salary

B) I got nothin to hide

C) I'm sure you can scramble the reader somehow (spray or something)
I agree with a and b but I think it's been proven that none of those spray things or plate covers can fool the cameras (mythbusters ftw).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
473 Posts
i think i saw this on the discovery channel or something one day, with a bunch of other cop toys under development.
it looks like a great idea. but it wouldn't work very well in a state like Florida where we are not require to put license plates on the first of our cars. a simple reverse park might save a criminal some jail time?
i can see how this can be used as abuse, the government tracks and records all automotive movement and stores it into a national database. might stir up some privacy law suits?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,470 Posts
i'm all for cost effectiveness considering

A) I pay their salary

B) I got nothin to hide

C) I'm sure you can scramble the reader somehow (spray or something)
I am so tired of hearing that, especially in regards to the Patriot Act and the FISA bill. How many times are you going to say that same phrase?

It's like the frog in the pot of water that heats up. You can't take everything from the people at once, but if you take their liberties bit by bit, all the while tricking them into thinking it makes them more secure, they won't even notice the water has started to boil.
 

·
Boobze
Joined
·
3,237 Posts
I am so tired of hearing that, especially in regards to the Patriot Act and the FISA bill. How many times are you going to say that same phrase?

It's like the frog in the pot of water that heats up. You can't take everything from the people at once, but if you take their liberties bit by bit, all the while tricking them into thinking it makes them more secure, they won't even notice the water has started to boil.
Give me one situation where this could be abused.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
224 Posts
The only issue I could see is if this thing has the ability to do background checks, race, gender, age, etc.. Then they could profile more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,470 Posts
Give me one situation where this could be abused.
Like it said in the article, this thing will be replaced with something more sophisticated soon. The "new" thing will no doubt be able to scan more plates and probably give more detailed information. At some point in the future, the government will be able to track everywhere you go, which they don't need to and shouldn't be doing.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top