Joined
·
4,925 Posts
wtf..
I agree with Scott, this post is worthless due to your elementary comments.Manny_TXtreme said:What?? How can you even compare CumHo's to Yokos.
ES100 is stronger..better grip.. only downside to it is noise level. Yes you will get some noise from these, but overall in comparision to the supposed Jet 712s, there is still no competition.
I doesnt matter how many variation of 712's there are either. A CumHo is still a CumHo. Maybe its bias since I personally hate those tires.
But hmm ya... Yoko's all the way!
:whogives:HilfigerCelica said:
I agree with Scott, this post is worthless due to your elementary comments.
I have the ES100 on my celica for about 3K miles now and I'm very satisfied. The value of these tires are excellent. There's plenty of gripe in the wet and dry. I think they're a little better than stock but the stock were going bald so it's not a fair comparison. I'm not sure if the ES100 are going to last longer than the Kumho's because each manufacturer is different. If a tire has a wear rate of 340, it will last longer than a tire which has a wear rate of 240 from the same manufacter but you can't compare these numbers to difference manufacturers.
:stupid:Manny_TXtreme said:
:whogives:
EDIT: Should've joined in the discussion earlier.
Yea I agree..you definitely should. lmao!HilfigerCelica said:
:stupid:
EDIT: Should stop posting without thinking.