I rode in my buddies built h2b hybrid...Car just feels completely different than mine...Besides there are WAY too many boosted Hondas in the area...A fast boosted 4 banger has less wow factor than a N/A one
170 ish range...With the new p30 pistons (oem part to yield a 12.0 to 1 cr) and a set of skunk2 stage 1's, ill shoot for the 200ish rangetdunn1981 said:Nice races, sounds about right for a bolt-on GT-S. Was that closer than you expected it to be? How much WHP do you think you're putting down now that you're NA?
diegoaccord said:It's gonna take more than those 2 parts for 200 WHP. One step you can take is a PR3 head, and also you'll need a ITR IM. PCT Pistons, instead of P30. Gonna need bigger cams than S2S1.
Actually I kinda wanna get back into another Honda, but people are expecting me to trade my GT-S for stupid ****, like EG's, D series cars, and LS Tegs. Or B16 car with LS trannies. I did that swap(B16/LStrans) myself, and I will never drive a B series VTEC with an LS tranny again. My coupe ran 15.7 @91, thanks to LS trans.
The general consesus is also that longer gears are better for boost...but that doesnt make it right...And a nonvtec bottom end can see 8000 rpm with just replacement arp bearings and rod bolts...its been done all too many times...Not saying the vtec bottom end isnt better equipped from the factory...But to say the nonvtec block cant do it, is false. And I cant say I agree about the hybrids making generally less power..Maybe one built poorly, but just this summer we sent out an LS-VTEC that sailed easily to 235 whp all motor. More torque with same rpm will yield higher HP, thats mathematically provendiegoaccord said:That's the general consensus. ITR uses PR3, also. Of course factory ported. I wonder why they wouldn't use a ported P72. Oh well.
Frankens are ****ty, LSVTEC, or CRVTEC. Number one, the stock piston on each are ****ty for NA. This means you need to take it apart right off the bat. The R/S on B18A/B and B18C aren't that different, BUT non VTEC blocks don't have oil squirters, and other things for the motor to withstand 8000 RPM. Another point, frankens naturally have a lower power peak, with added displacement. Lastly B20 needs sleeved, no matter what.
There is a REASON Honda engineered a whole seperate 1.8 block for VTEC. Today I just turned down a Thunder Gray Metalic DC4, and he will throw in money for me to do LSVTEC. Hell with that, LS block, LS pistons, and LS tranny will result in a 16 second car.
Actually, you shift where peak power is made by way of the head...IM packaging, Cam packaging, given the bottom end has the supplemental static cr to support the Cams and IM, Mathematically you shift where peak torque/power is made by way of the above mentioned parts. Once again I can lay down the dyno's as well as the dynamics equations of the b20 vtecs making top end power quite well beyond 7k...Its just a matter of you asking for itdiegoaccord said:I didn't say power was decreased, I said PEAK of power. As in peak RPM that max HP is made. Where a stock B16 usually dyno max HP around 7800 (even though Honda spec sheet say 7600) LSVTEC usually makes it max HP around 7300, and B20VT at 7K flat. Displacement shifts the powerband down in the RPM range. what you get in torque, you lose top end. You can never have your cake and eat it...TQ or max RPM...