Joined
·
176 Posts
u cant compare drivers of 2 completly different cars.
Did I hook up? Ask yourself that.slowjetta1.8T said:"I made him look stupid with bald Michellins "
U sound kinda stupid actually. Bald tires are better off the line. Less groves etc the better for traction. They are more like drag radials. WHen i had my stock eagle rsa on there they were bald as ****. My car hooked soo much better than it does now with my Nitto 450 nt's.
U should of tried running from a roll also. I dont like the passats. There fat ugly Foker
Who the hell says I'm stock, I could probably very easily hang with your chipped GTI without much problems.BrandonC said:Yeah, I know you were talking about me, but the thing is that I KNOW how fast a chipped Passat is, and it's faster than a Celica GT. A chipped Passat is faster than a stock GTI. My stock GTI was faster than my friend's 2000 Celi GT. Soooo....the Passat is faster than the GT. Simple as that.
Christ yourself..... Yes, a Passat weighs more than a GTI. But a chipped Passat is faster than a stock GTI. Trust me.MicaCeli said:OK
Passat weight =?
GTI weight = PROBABLY LOWER!!
Just couse its a freeking 1.8t doesnt mean its fast...........Christ.
Slava
:werd: :burnout:Sometimes a gt can surprise people.
TRD ClutchBrandonC said:
Christ yourself..... Yes, a Passat weighs more than a GTI. But a chipped Passat is faster than a stock GTI. Trust me.
Anyways, I could really care less. Daks -- from your lack of stuff in your sig, it seemed you were stock. Most people with mods here put them in their sig.