NewCelica.org Forum banner
81 - 100 of 350 Posts
Hmm did anyone notice that the skidpad test was done on a 220ft circle? I thought the basis of most skidpad tests were done on 200ft circles.
 
pathetic

this is what happens when they soften cars and add more weight

at least Subaru DROPPED 50 lbs (100 lbs in the hatch) from their new

0-60 in 5 and 1/4 mile in 13.8 is identical to a stock Legacy GT

and I know which I'd choose under those circumstances . . . .
 
EuGeNiLe GTS said:
italiaplaya said:
wrx sti still better, i like the old look of the evo
at what? their brochure showing it has bigger displacement and more hp, but when it comes down to real numbers on the dyno and track, there are an overwelming amount of high hp and fast 1/4 evos compared to the subarus.
stock for stock, the 2.0L EVO IX actually makes more power on the dyno than the 2.5L WRX STI

if you can get your hands on an unmolested IX, now would be the time.

I'm furiously looking for one
 
McCelicaGTS said:
wow the new evo is nothing impressive at all. What have the done to the evo name!?
Evo isn't known for its straight line speed, same goes with the STi. It carries a name in rallying and the circuit. So having a non-impressive 0-60 time doesn't mean the car should drive off the cliff. What I'm curious about is whether or not it can regain the Evo name in the WRC. When was the last time anyone seen or heard about an Evo winning a manufacturers championship?? Back when Tommi Makinen was in his prime? That's almost a decade ago!
 
Gas-n-Grease said:
McCelicaGTS said:
wow the new evo is nothing impressive at all. What have the done to the evo name!?
Evo isn't known for its straight line speed, same goes with the STi. It carries a name in rallying and the circuit. So having a non-impressive 0-60 time doesn't mean the car should drive off the cliff. What I'm curious about is whether or not it can regain the Evo name in the WRC. When was the last time anyone seen or heard about an Evo winning a manufacturers championship?? Back when Tommi Makinen was in his prime? That's almost a decade ago!
uh, the EVO has ALWAYS been known for its straight line speed (and its basic all-around awesome functionality which includes crazy brakes and astonishing handling). The 4G63 was probably the greatest 2.0L engine ever made.
 
marc said:
uh, the EVO has ALWAYS been known for its straight line speed (and its basic all-around awesome functionality which includes crazy brakes and astonishing handling). The 4G63 was probably the greatest 2.0L engine ever made.
I would agree. People call me crazy for saying it wouldn't surprise me to see those IX's at Barret Jackson one day. When you look at price and performance numbers though I fail to see why that's so unrealistic.
 
marc said:
stock for stock, the 2.0L EVO IX actually makes more power on the dyno than the 2.5L WRX STI

if you can get your hands on an unmolested IX, now would be the time.

I'm furiously looking for one
not an 07 STi.

If you want a car that will be at barret jackson one day, its an STi limited. More HP, classier (black brembos, no wing) and very rare.

these numbers are pretty weaksauce. People are getting their checkbooks out for a 35k ubercar that runs 14's when I'm running low 13's with a stock turbo lesser model wrx with just EM and exhaust?

knife, meet gunfight. This car is disappointing.
 
81 - 100 of 350 Posts